In the aftermath of a
presidential campaign which research now has shown was dominated by fake news,
which may have even influenced the outcome of the election, it is imperative
that voters, and even more importantly, our young people, especially since so
many people rely on social media for their news, are able to determine the
difference between fake news and actual fact. After all, our society, indeed and
unfortunately, has become a post-truth world.
As a voter and as a former
teacher and librarian, I have long realized the importance of teaching children
(and adults) to distinguish between misinformation, bias, and just out-right
deliberately created fake news. I wish to share this excellently written blog
post written by a librarian, Judy Moreillon, about that very concern. I have
shared her post below, and I assign full credit to Ms Moreillon for her wise
words and advice for addressing the problem:
Fake “News” in a “Post-truth” World
Posted on November 28, 2016 by Judi
Moreillon
In the wake of a contentious U.S. presidential election cycle, researchers and educators are shining a spotlight on critical “information literacy” skills. Determining authority, accuracy, and bias have long been essential aspects of analyzing content and sources of information. Today, this is no easy task for students (and adults as well) when authors of “information” do their best to deceive readers or hide their identity behind domains, such as .org, factual-seeming but phony statistical data, and authoritative-sounding language based on “pants of fire” lies.
In her 2014 book, It’s
Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens, researcher Danah Boyd
wrote, “becoming literate in a networked age requires hard work, regardless of
age” (177). While the amount of fake “news” has increased exponentially, the
problem of determining authority and validity in information sources has been a
critical skill since the early days of the Internet.
How long have school librarians been
challenging students to determine the bias in David Duke’s Stormfront
Martin Luther King Jr. Web site? I began using it in 2002 when
I moved from an elementary to a high school position, and I am certain others
were using it before me. (See the 7.3 Category Matrix from Coteaching
Reading Comprehension Strategies in Secondary School Libraries: Maximizing Your
Impact Challenging “Determining Main Ideas” Lesson Plan.)
Researchers at Stanford University
recently conducted and released the results of a 2015-2016 study, “Evaluating Information: The
Cornerstone of Civic Online Reasoning.” The study showed what
school and academic librarians have known through their own observations and
action research related to middle, high school, and college-level students’
information literacy proficiency: “Young people’s ability to reason about the
information on the Internet can be summed up in one word: bleak” (4).
Last week on LM_NET, school
librarian Andrew van Zyl of St. Alban’s College, Pretoria, South Africa, raised
the responsibilities of school librarians in a “post-truth” world when he
posted information about Oxford Dictionaries’ announcement that
“post-truth” reflects the “passing year in language.” It defines “post-truth”
as “relating to or denoting circumstances
in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than
appeals to emotion and personal belief.”
Some who entered the conversation wondered
if librarians should be engaged in “politics.” For me the answer is clear.
Literacy is “political” because it empowers people. From my perspective, school
librarians are required to teach youth to determine the
authority and accuracy of information and we are charged with co-teaching with
classroom teachers to ensure that students are information literate.
Taken together, “fake news” in a
“post-truth” world creates an even greater need for the information literacy
expertise of school librarians. Information is supposed to be factual, whether
or not it is considered “news.” (Even in the halcyon days when people read
printed newspapers, reporters and editors frequently rushed to “get ahead of
the story” and published “errors” that later had to be corrected.) When school
librarians bring their expertise to the collaboration table, they can co-teach
with classroom teachers to help students develop critical literacy skills that
are even more essential in the online information environment.
I think this recent post on
FactCheck.org “How to Spot Fake News”
shows what librarians have long called “information literacy” is finally
getting traction as a set of must-have skills for 21st-century students and
adults as well: (Information literacy and reading comprehension skills in
parentheses)
• Consider the source.
(Authority)
• Read beyond the headline. (Authority)
• Check the author. (Authority)
• What’s the support? (Accuracy and Reliability)
• Check the date. (Relevance and Reliability)
• Is this some kind of joke? (New in the post-truth world!)
• Check your biases. (Questioning)
• Consult the experts. (Questioning)
• Read beyond the headline. (Authority)
• Check the author. (Authority)
• What’s the support? (Accuracy and Reliability)
• Check the date. (Relevance and Reliability)
• Is this some kind of joke? (New in the post-truth world!)
• Check your biases. (Questioning)
• Consult the experts. (Questioning)
Like all educators, school
librarians must continually self-assess and develop our skills. But we have a
strong information literacy foundation on which to build and the desire and
responsibility to share our expertise with students, colleagues, and community.
Fake “news” and a “post-truth” world call all school librarians to step up
and lead.
Works Cited
Boyd, Dana. It’s Complicated: The
Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press,
2014.
Robertson, Lori Robertson, and
Eugene Kiely. “How to Spot Fake News,” FactCheck.org. November 18, 2016,
http://www.factcheck.org/2016/11/how-to-spot-fake-news/
Stanford History Education Group.
“Evaluating Information: The Cornerstone of Civic Online Reasoning: Executive
Summary,” Stanford University. 22 Nov. 2016, https://sheg.stanford.edu/upload/V3LessonPlans/Executive%20Summary%2011.21.16.pdf
Image Credit: Newspaper Clipping
created at Fodey.com
Additional Recommended Reading:
Stevenson, Sara. “Information Literacy Lessons Crucial in a Post-Truth World,” Knowledge Quest Blog, 18 Nov. 2016,
http://knowledgequest.aasl.org/information-literacy-lessons-crucial-post-truth-world/
Stevenson, Sara. “Information Literacy Lessons Crucial in a Post-Truth World,” Knowledge Quest Blog, 18 Nov. 2016,
http://knowledgequest.aasl.org/information-literacy-lessons-crucial-post-truth-world/
Valenza, Joyce. “Truth, Truthiness,
Triangulation, and the Librarian Way: A News Literacy Toolkit for a Post-truth
World,” Neverending Search Blog, 26 Nov. 2016, http://blogs.slj.com/neverendingsearch/2016/11/26/truth-truthiness-triangulation-and-the-librarian-way-a-news-literacy-toolkit-for-a-post-truth-world/
Picture credit and Stanford study info: NPR News
No comments:
Post a Comment